tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2600947515654238699.post1603704455928939060..comments2024-03-09T19:23:22.482-03:00Comments on The RPGPundit: Wild West Update: Calamity!RPGPundithttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17267330191433119298noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2600947515654238699.post-84318933070189599362016-05-22T16:47:53.532-04:002016-05-22T16:47:53.532-04:00No, not at all. At the end of the session they com...No, not at all. At the end of the session they commented, rightly, on how many different ways this could all have gone. They were the ones who were basically directing events. The criminal was a kind of hapless idiot, and whatever he did depended on what the PCs were doing; while Calamity Jane was just a walking disaster area, for the PCs to contain or direct. It would have even been completely possible for Jane to die in the shootout if things had played out that way (though given it was two against one and the PC with Jane at the time is the best gunman in the group, it seemed unlikely; it was just as unlikely how it turned out - where Jane, who is in fact not a good shot and doesn't aim managed to get a freak hit with exploding damage that blew out an artery in the criminal's thigh). If the crook had lived, the PCs might also have been able to figure out more info about the person the gambler was mistaken for, and his group.RPGPundithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17267330191433119298noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2600947515654238699.post-68600832980113799742016-05-22T11:28:11.335-04:002016-05-22T11:28:11.335-04:00So what did the PCs do while you ran your plot? As...So what did the PCs do while you ran your plot? Aside from the gambler, it sounds like they were observers rather than participants in this game. Doc Savagehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08783244633195233970noreply@blogger.com