Today, my Everyjoe article presents a stunning development: Has the New York Times gone completely crazy, by posting the image of a revered figure of the Islamic faith covered in elephant dung and surrounded by cut-out pictures of buttocks from pornographic magazines?!
Well, yes. But they did it by accident. They really meant to insult Christianity, of course. And their hypocritical stance on "respect" for (certain) religious images shows just where this newspaper stands on freedom of expression.
Please share it, retweet, go comment, etc. etc. Thanks!
Currently Smoking: Lorenzetti Solitario Egg + Gawith's Navy Flake