The new and improved defender of RPGs!

Sunday, 16 April 2017

The Real Story of the Battle of Berkeley, aka The Violent Totalitarian Bitch Deserved It

So we've seen a lot of this gif lately:



Along with quotes from leftist shit-heads claiming that this was an image of a "white supremacist punching a woman in the face" during "fights between anti-trump and pro-trump protesters in Berkeley".

Both those claims are lies.

Why don't you fucking cunt leftists tell the whole story? Like how:

a) this happened at a peaceful event organized by Free Speech supporters. It was not some melee between two groups of protesters that just happened to run across each other. It was specifically a Patriot Day meeting of free-speech advocates.

b) The "woman" was part of a huge group of Left-Wing violent thugs who went to the protest specifically to physically attack the free speech advocates. As we've seen for the last two years, it has NEVER been the Right that goes to left-wing events to physically attack people. It is always the Left who comes to Right-wing events with the intention of violently attacking people.

c) On her facebook page, this woman stated her goal was to 'bring back 100 nazi scalps'. Her clear intention was violence.

d) The police in Berkeley were ordered to disarm the Right-wing free-speech advocates, which they did, and were then ordered NOT to disarm the left-wing thugs who brought metal sticks, pepper-spray and explosives!

e) the police were explicitly ordered by Berkeley city government to stand down and do NOTHING to do protect the free speech advocates they'd just disarmed from being attacked by the ARMED and violent left-wing thugs whose goal was specifically to commit acts of violence.

f) In spite of this (because you leftists are fucking pussies), the free speech advocates quickly managed to get the upper hand, by finally deciding they'd had enough of just being beaten on and trying to be the 'better person' and not punch back. WE PUNCHED BACK. And we kicked the fucking shit out of you goddamn commie fucks.

g) In the full version this video, filmed just before the fascist leftist scum were driven away from the event, it is obvious that this 'woman' is charging into the man with the intention of assaulting him and she is in fact (however pathetically) trying to punch him in the throat to disable him. HE PUNCHED HER IN SELF DEFENSE.



I have no idea if this guy who punched the violent totalitarian thug (that happened to be a woman) is a 'white supremacist' or not, but if I had to bet I'd assume that's a media lie. After all, the Left have called me and other fellow Latinos 'white supremacist'. They've called Black people and Asian people and American Indian and East Indians 'white supremacists' too. They called a half-Jewish homosexual a 'white supremacist'. Those words don't mean anything anymore which is a fucking shame, and THE LEFT'S FAULT. In fact, this woman who got punched came to the event specifically with the intention of viciously assaulting 'nazis' when it was obvious that 99.9% of the people at the Free Speech event were anything but. She didn't care if this guy she was lunging at was a real honest-to-god Nazi or if he had adopted 12 black babies with his Burmese transgender husband. He had committed the 'hate crime' of disagreeing with her, and so to her he was a 'nazi'.





What option do you really have, when for the 20th time a group of violent thugs come to your picnic to beat on you, when a woman is charging at you trying to give you a disabling punch to the throat because she wants your 'scalp', but to punch the stupid bitch in the goddamn face??

Certainly, almost no woman ever deserves to be hit by a man. But this bitch sure did. Almost no woman deserves to be called a 'stupid bitch' either, but this one certainly was, when she came to a peaceful event looking to physically assault people for daring to have different ideas than hers.

But don't mistake my statement for misogyny though: all the men who came with her were stupid goddamn bitches who deserved to be punched in the face, too.


Like I said, I have no idea if the guy who hit her was a 'white supremacist' or not, but I know that in that moment he, and everyone who fought FOR free speech instead of for leftist totalitarian censorship and terrorism at Berkeley, is A MOTHERFUCKING HERO.

RPGPundit

Currently Smoking: Neerup Bent Billiard + Image Latakia
.

32 comments:

  1. Yeah, the extreme Left has indeed done some serious harm by labelling everything that doesn't agree with it a "Fascist" or a "white supremacist". But the Alt-Right does the same by defending racism and hatespeech in the name of "freedom of speech".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is no such thing as hatespeech. There is only speech.

      Delete
    2. Thank you for illustrating my point.

      Delete
    3. Thomas, this just proves you don't believe in the very concept of free speech. You think you get to choose what is acceptable speech, which is the exact opposite of free speech. Are you in Europe? Europeans have that problem a lot; they don't even know what free speech is in places such as Germany and Holland.

      Delete
    4. There's no definition of "Free Speech" that does not become absurd if it means "any speech I agree with is allowed, some/all that I don't agree with isn't".

      The whole foundation for Free Speech is found in the notion that no matter how despicable you find what someone says, you must defend to the death their right to say it.

      Delete
  2. The moment I dread is when the guns come out. I'm kind of surprised that hasn't happened already -- there was a shooting at one rally in Seattle but that was apparently Left-on-Left so has faded quickly from the news. I almost wonder if the liberal politicians and media are encouraging this kind of political terrorism by "antifas" in the hope of provoking some kind of latter-day Kent State which they can then use to bash conservatives, Trump, and of course gun ownership in general.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why would they? Nixon won a landslide after Kent State.

      Delete
    2. Because they're stupid, and still think they control the narrative through traditional Establishment media.

      Delete
  3. Was she aiming to misbehave? Yes. But was she attacking this man? No.

    And how do I know? Well it's all thanks to the evidence you presented!

    So looking at that you can see the man is preparing a punch before she sees him, and she is closing her eyes in expectation, putting up her hands in a defensive manner, and has her back tilted away from the aggressor. This is clearly someone with _no_ self-defense training.

    But don't take my word for it. Go ask actual HtH combat specialists, forensic experts, and kinesthetic animators what they think yourself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your judging all that from a photo that may be several seconds after she attacked him and found he was willing to fight back.

      Delete
    2. Clearly seeing what you want to see. Good try.

      Delete
    3. Ahhhh, Kasmir, still trying to reason with the unreasonable, I see. Consequences are a bitch, however. Consequences of course are never pre-figured by those who do not respect others. So it goes...

      Delete
    4. And here's the point where I share the original footage, free of political commentary, which @ThePundit forgot to do.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8GVtXfATtI

      So no +Rob Schwarz, that's not 'several seconds' after she attacked him.

      And it's funny you use the 'everyone seeing what they want to see' defense +Matt Celis, because that ends up dismissing mine, yours, _and_ @ThePundit's assessment in one magnificent blow. Well played. Perhaps you can tell us how _you_ asses facts then.

      People want this to _matter_, but all I see are a bunch of clowns who think some comic book style battle in #Berkeley will resolve things. This shit is nothing more than a modern #FightClub, and just as relevant.

      But now that I have you chuckleheads in one room, do you condone violent action against those who disagree with your politics?

      Delete
    5. We are condoning self-defense. The leftist showed up to silence others with violent acts. Do you condone that?

      There would have been no melee if the leftists stayed home.

      Delete
    6. She wrote about taking 100 nazi scalps (yes, it's ludicrous that this little girl thought she'd be a badass in a street fight against large men, but that's what Feminism does to your brain), and was photographed using a bottle as a weapon in the fight.

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  4. So a neo-Nazi who was (a) dishonorably discharged from the Marines, (b) robbed a cab driver at gunpoint for "looking Iraqi", (c) when serving prison time for the robbery chose David Duke as his role model and inspiration and (d) punched out a girl is Pundy's new man-crush? I know he's been depressed and angry ever since his other hero, Milo NAMBLA-nopolous was exposed as an advocate for the "benefits" of screwing underage boys, but surely RPGPundit can do better than this, right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You don't see the real problem here, do you? With your "punch all the Nazis because their existence is violence" conflated with the very open desire to censor even thoughts and attack on the basis of "conservatives are close enough to Nazis", you did something that shouldn't be possible: you created a conflict where the Nazis are the innocent people. YOU MADE THE NAZIS THE GOOD GUYS! THAT IS HOW BADLY YOU FUCKED UP!

      Delete
    2. Elfdart supports people who shoot explosives at old women to try to set them on fire for coming to a Free Speech talk. That's all you need to know about his sense of morality.

      Delete
    3. Care to back up this claim with an actual quote? Or would you like to apologize for telling a blatant lie?

      Delete
    4. And no, the Left didn't make nazis the "good guys" (though they certainly seem to be trying really hard to give the Nazis a run for their money as the 'bad guys'); what they did was in some way much WORSE.

      They created a situation where the word "nazi" doesn't MEAN anything anymore, because you can no longer know who really is or isn't a nazi. They called me a Nazi. They called Sheriff Clark, a black man, a Nazi. They called a gay jew a Nazi. They call EVERYONE who stands up to them a "nazi" and say it's ok to physically assault nazis, what did they think was going to happen?!

      The end result is that the media claims "this guy who fought at the rally is a neo-nazi", and I'm like "how the fuck am I supposed to believe you? You called ME a nazi five minutes ago!"

      They've destroyed the ability to easily distinguish Nazis from non-Nazis. Which is unbelievably stupid and irresponsible.

      Delete
    5. Mr Ferguson, could you point to where I advocated punching anyone, except in legitimate self-defense?

      Delete
    6. "Actual quote"? You're doing it RIGHT NOW. You're defending someone who came to the rally to attack unarmed people.

      Delete
  5. So you admit you can't point to a single quote where I advocated using explosives on old ladies.

    Concession accepted.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Until you unequivocally denounce Antifa and all members of the Left who support it, you are IMPLICITLY supporting violence against innocents for the sake of suppressing Free Speech. You're scum.

      Delete
    2. Sorry Elfdart, but on this one, Pundit is right and you are 100% wrong.

      If you don't understand why, please read this article:

      http://lkvi.blogspot.ca/2017/02/there-is-no-justified-violence.html

      TLDR: You are advocating for violence in a democratic society. That makes YOU the problem.

      Delete
    3. Care to provide a quote to back it up? Can't do it can you?

      Delete
  6. Going by that logic, until you unequivocally denounce Milo NAMBLA-nopolous and all members of the Right who support him, you are IMPLICITLY supporting child molestation.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_UtZUcJjIw

    You're scum.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Milo doesn't support child molestation. Since he's made that clear, I don't need to denounce him.
      On the other hand, Antifa made it very clear that they now feel that MURDERING Trump supporters is justified. You fucking support the violent murder of unarmed innocents.

      Delete
  7. Apparently you didn't watch the video from the Joe Rogan Show where your idol extols the virtues of getting molested. I know it's not pleasant viewing but facts are facts. Milo Sandusky thinks being molested as a kid made him a better lover as an adult. That's sick, and so are you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. George Takei on the Howard Stern show said much the same thing about being molested as a kid. Don't forget to list him in your list.

      Delete
  8. The whole "Punch A Nazi in the face" set are useful idiots working towards a future that is a boot stamping on a face forever.

    Let people be known by their words and deeds.

    ReplyDelete